silikononweb.blogg.se - Cs go aimbot 5.7.17

#Cs go aimbot 5.7.17 how to#

And as an added bonus, writing all your CSS files with everywhere basically means you're not learning and authoring CSS.

Once you go Tailwind, you can never leave.

Therefore, it's simply the truth that CSS files built for Tailwind are non-standard (aka proprietary) and fundamentally incompatible with all other CSS frameworks and tooling.

It's not something you can count on for source code.

While it's true you can take the generated output CSS of a site and use that without Tailwind, it's typically a bundled compilation of dozens if not hundreds of small CSS files scattered around a codebase (if you write CSS-per-component files like we do).

If you remove Tailwind from your build process, that statement doesn't work and your CSS is broken. It requires the presence of Tailwind in your build process.

mt-3 in a CSS file only works if you use Tailwind.

This is where a lot of Tailwind fans get tripped up and keep on arguing with me over and over again, so I'll try to explain this as clearly and obviously as possible. Reason 2: is fundamentally incompatible and non-standard (and largely unnecessary). Much of our HTML is oriented around component-scoped class names (fairly close to BEM in concept) and thus we use extensively. Now I already hear many of you screaming at your computer screens to tell me "dude, just use if you want to keep your HTML clean! Problem solved!" Well, that is a potential solution, and in fact that's what we've done on the aforementioned project. Sorry folks! You'll never get me to appreciate this:Įnter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

This is a tacit admission that writing markup this way initially seems ugly and weird-but somehow we'll eventually just "get over it" because the benefits are so great.Īfter a year of writing Tailwind, I haven't gotten over it. Adam even acknowledges this head on when he begs us to "suppress the urge to retch long enough to give it a chance…". But at the very least, I hate the way utility-css-only HTML looks. This first reason is an aesthetic concern, yet it's intimately related to real technical challenges which I'll outline shortly. Reason 1: Tailwind promotes ugly-ass HTML. So since Twitter and Hacker News comments are apparently poor mediums for technical conversations of this magnitude, I will now attempt to outline the very real reasons why Tailwind is not for me. As a programmer who has worked full-time in the web industry since the late 90s, that just doesn't sit right with me. In fact I have some real concerns about Tailwind, and what I find supremely frustrating is whenever I raise these concerns, I get immediate pushback from die-hard Tailwind fans who accuse me (in so many words) of just being a fucking idiot. So whatever you may come at me with, you can't accuse me of not giving Tailwind the good ol' college try. A project one of my largest clients has me developing is built on top of React and Tailwind. If you can suppress the urge to retch long enough to give it a chance, I really think you'll wonder how you ever worked with CSS any other way.

I’ve written a few thousand words on why traditional “semantic class names” are the reason CSS is hard to maintain, but the truth is you’re never going to believe me until you actually try it. I'll quote directly from creator Adam Wathan highlighted right on the Tailwind website: Rails is very opinionated, for example, and I love using Rails.īut Tailwind definitely throws down a gauntlet. In other words, it's opinionated and it inspires a cadre of evangelists. The problem I keep running into however is this increasing popular sentiment that Tailwind is the future (man). There are plenty of groovy tech stacks to go around. There are tons of web technologies out there which I'll never use. Whoever it was built for, it was not built for me.Īnd in one sense, that's fine. But at a pure technical level, I simply don't like Tailwind. I think the folks building Tailwind are talented and nice people. I've gotten into more than one heated argument on the interwebs lately over Tailwind CSS. I haven't tried it out yet, but once I do I'll formulate additional thoughts and link to them from here. March 2021 Update: the experimental new JIT (Just-In-Time) compiler for Tailwind has the potential to alleviate some of the concerns outlined here and also provides some intriguing new benefits.

#Cs go aimbot 5.7.17 how to#

I remain as dubious of TW as ever, and in fact have started writing a course specifically designed to teach people how to switch away from Tailwind and use the best of today's "vanilla" CSS. Unfortunately, Tailwind's purview has only grown in directions that are breathtaking in their weirdness. March 2022 Update: Well the JIT is now the default way of managing Tailwind output generation, so that's cool.